[aso-council] RE: [AC-COORD] Re: 6. Public listeing facility to AC phone conferences

["Ray Plzak" <plzak@arin.net>]

We will ask at the ARIN meeting in April.

Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ac-coord@lists.aso.icann.org
> [mailto:owner-ac-coord@lists.aso.icann.org]On Behalf Of Hans Petter
> Holen
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 2:32 PM
> To: aso-council@aso.icann.org
> Cc: ac-coord@aso.icann.org
> Subject: [AC-COORD] Re: 6. Public listeing facility to AC phone
> conferences
> 
> 
> As mentioned at our last phone conference, I asked the RIPE 
> community wether
> there was any interest in setting up listen in facilities for 
> our phone
> conferences. A few (<5) expressed by a show of hands that they were
> interested, a few (<5) expressed by show of hands that they 
> think we need no
> use resources to look into this. The wast majority (>100) expressed no
> opioion on this issue.
> 
> Maybe it is worth asking the other regional communities the 
> same question ?
> 
> -hph
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hans Petter Holen" <hph@online.no>
> To: <aso-council@aso.icann.org>
> Cc: <ac-coord@aso.icann.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 11:51 PM
> Subject: 6. Public listeing facility to AC phone conferences
> 
> 
> > Dear AC,
> > I am writing this message while I am listening in to the 
> Names Council
> phone
> > meeting which provides for 20 listen only ports.
> >
> > I have previously not understood the need for such 
> listening facilities.
> >
> > I now understand that this matter have several aspects I 
> have not seen
> > earlier.
> >
> > It may be useful to think upon ourselves as elected 
> officers, and that the
> > people that elected us, may have a need, from time to time, 
> to listen in
> > on what we are doing.
> > The question then becomes why should we deny them that ?
> >
> > I also belive that it will improve not only meeting 
> efficiency but also
> > transparency to actually discusss and have clear proposals written
> > down before we try to make desicions.
> >
> > Now this again leads to the perhaps most important issue 
> procedural issue
> to
> > bear in mind; If we are comitted to a bottom up process, we 
> of cource need
> > to seek gloal consensus in our regional fora.
> >
> > Looking forward to hear other views !
> >
> > Yours,
> > Hans Petter
> >
> >
*       on-line archive: http://aso.icann.org/wilma-bin/wilma/aso-council     *
*   To unsubscribe:  send "unsubscribe" to aso-council-request@aso.icann.org  *