[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?

To: Michael Sondow <msondow@iciiu.org>
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
From: "David R. Conrad" <David.Conrad@nominum.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 02:05:48 -0800
Cc: "David R. Conrad" <David.Conrad@nominum.com>, gds@best.com, list@ifwp.org, aso-comment@lists.aso.icann.org
Organization: Nominum, Inc.
References: <200003250207.SAA25555@shell5.ba.best.com> <38DC2E28.6069C48@iciiu.org> <38DCA675.94244F04@nominum.com> <38DD7C88.8FF77440@iciiu.org>

Michael,

> I meant free in the
> sense that all networks were equal, had equal access, were equally
> connected to all others. Isn't that so? 

No.  Not since classfull addressing and the EGP/IGP split was implemented,
back during ARPANet days.

Rgds,
-drc


*       on-line archive: http://aso.icann.org/wilma-bin/wilma/aso-comment     *
*   To unsubscribe:  send "unsubscribe" to aso-comment-request@aso.icann.org  *

References:
- Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
  - From: Greg Skinner <gds@best.com>
- Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
  - From: Michael Sondow <msondow@iciiu.org>
- Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
  - From: "David R. Conrad" <David.Conrad@nominum.com>
- Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
  - From: Michael Sondow <msondow@iciiu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
Next by Date: Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread