[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?

To: list@ifwp.org, "David R. Conrad" <David.Conrad@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
From: "Richard J. Sexton" <richard@dnso.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:47:46 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Michael Sondow <msondow@iciiu.org>, mike.norris@heanet.ie, aso-policy@lists.aso.icann.org, aso-comment@lists.aso.icann.org, list@ifwp.org, ga@dnso.org

>On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, David R. Conrad wrote:

>> What I would like to see is continued reliance on technical considerations for
>> the allocation of IPv4 address space rather than a system that relies on
>> politics.

Do you feel the same way about the domain name system?


--
richard@tangled.web        richard@dnso.com       http://www.dnso.com
It's about travel on expense accounts to places with good beer. - BKR


*       on-line archive: http://aso.icann.org/wilma-bin/wilma/aso-comment     *
*   To unsubscribe:  send "unsubscribe" to aso-comment-request@aso.icann.org  *

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [IFWP] Re: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP addressholders - are they represented?
  - From: "David R. Conrad" <David.Conrad@nominum.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
Next by Date: RE: [aso-policy] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are theyrepresented?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread