Selection. Each RIR signatory of the MOU will select three [3] individuals to the Address Council using the following process:
Each RIR will annually issue a public call for nominees to the Address Council at least 90 days before the RIR's policy meeting. Any individual can submit a nomination to the RIR.
The due date for this call shall be 30 days before the meeting.
The nominees must be individuals.
A list of all nominees who agree to run for the Address Council must be posted on the RIR's web page at least 15 days before the meeting along with a statement from each nominee who wishes to make one.
Selection of the RIR's members of the Address Council will be made via an open and transparent procedure. The individuals selected for the Address Council must not be staff members of any RIR.
Term.
The term of Address Council members will be 3 years. The initial Address Council members selected within each region will have staggered terms of 1, 2 and 3 years. The process by which these initial members are selected must also determine in an open and transparent manner, the assignment of terms to each of the initial members.
Removal.
Any RIR may remove one of its Address Council members during his or her term, if by an open and transparent process the RIR determines that that member should for any reason no longer serve on the Address Council.
Action by Address Council.
Unless otherwise specified in this MOU, all actions of the Address Council shall be taken by majority vote of the total number of members. Action may be taken at any meeting of the Address Council, which may be by telephone conference in which all participants can hear all others. Meetings of the Address Council may be called by request of any three members of the Address Council, with prior written notice to each of the other members; prior written notice shall be sent at least 45 days before physical meetings or fifteen (15) days before telephonic or other electronic meetings. In order to conduct business at any meeting of the Address Council, at least a quorum of members must be present; a quorum shall be present when at least a majority of the members of the Address Council are present, and when such members represent at least 2/3rds of the Signing RIRs.
Web Site.
The Address Council will arrange for the establishment and maintenance of a Web site devoted to ASO activities and news (the ICANN/ASO Web Site).
Secretary.
The Address Council will have a Secretary to coordinate administrative matters relating to the ASO and Address Council. The Secretary's term of office shall be one year. The position of Secretary will rotate among the Signing RIRs, with the initial Secretary to be selected by the APNIC, and subsequent Secretaries to be appointed by a randomly selected Signing RIR that has not appointed the Secretary in the current rotation.
No Compensation.
Neither the Secretary, nor any Address Council member or designated ICANN Board member shall be entitled to any compensation or reimbursement of expenses from the ASO. The ASO shall not be required to obtain insurance coverage for, or to indemnify, the members of the Address Council or persons acting in any other capacity by or for the ASO.
Observers from emerging registries.
ICANN may designate an individual representing an RIR in formation to participate as an observer on the Address Council in order to ease the transition of such new RIR into the ASO. Any such observers will be able to participate as AC members, but will not have the right to vote.
Advisory Role. The Address Council will advise the Board of ICANN on matters referred to the Address Council by the ICANN Board.
Policy Development.
The ICANN bylaws assign to the ASO the responsibility for the development of global policies relating to the following areas:
Definition of global policies for the distribution and registration of Internet address space (currently IPv4 and IPv6);
Definition of global policies for the distribution and registration of identifiers used in Internet inter-domain routing (currently BGP autonomous system numbers); and
Definition of global policies concerning the part of the DNS name space which is derived from the Internet address space and the inter-domain routing identifiers (currently in-addr.arpa and ip6.int).
The ASO advises ICANN on the operation of the DNS root name servers with regard to the subset of the DNS name space mentioned above.
Specifically this responsibility is limited to the above and does not extend to the business practices or local policies of the RIRs except as needed to ensure that the RIRs meet the criteria for ICANN approved RIRs. The RIRs are responsible to their own members and in most cases this must be their prime responsibility.
Normally, proposals for global policies within the area of the ASO's responsibility will be developed within the RIRs and forwarded to the Address Council for their consideration. In special circumstances the ICANN board can forward a request to develop a new global policy or to review an existing global policy within the area of the ASO's responsibility to the Address Council.
In addition the Address Council may accept, for consideration, proposals for changes to global IP address policy from any interested individual or entity.
In all cases when the Address Council reviews a proposal for new global policies or a proposed modification to existing policies in this area it will first solicit the opinions of all of the RIR signatories of the MOU and of the public. The Address Council will weigh the results of these solicitations in its deliberations to determine if it will approve the proposal. At least two thirds of the members of the Address Council must support a proposal for the proposal to be accepted and forwarded to the ICANN board for its consideration.
In any case where the ICANN board has requested that the Address Council develop a new policy within the area of the ASO's responsibility, the Address Council will forward that request to the RIR signatories of the MOU. The RIRs will then be given a reasonable time to propose policies to address the request from ICANN. Any resulting policy will be evaluated as described above. If an RIR decides, after reviewing the request, that the request is unreasonable, it can report that opinion to the Address Council. If the Address Council, after reviewing the responses, decides that the request is unreasonable or inadvisable, it can report that opinion to the ICANN board along with the reasons that the Address Council reached that conclusion.